Aurora, CO vs Naperville, IL: 130 vs 147

$1,759/mo ↓ 5%

Median Rent

$1,852/mo ↑ 5%

$84,320/yr ↓ 44%

Median Income

$150,937/yr ↑ 79%

$444,500 ↓ 13%

Home Value

$509,900 ↑ 15%

$1,762/mo ↓ 18%

Owner Costs

$2,161/mo ↑ 23%

390,201

Population

149,424

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Aurora, CO and Naperville, IL, the overall cost of living indices are 130 and 147 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $93/month cheaper in Aurora, saving renters about $1,116/year.

Median household income is $66,617/year higher in Naperville. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Aurora is $444,500 compared to $509,900 in Naperville.

Colorado has a lower income tax rate, making Aurora slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Aurora vs Naperville — common questions

Is Aurora or Naperville cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Aurora is cheaper to live in with an index of 130 compared to 147 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Aurora and Naperville?

Median rent in Aurora is $1,759/month and in Naperville it's $1,852/month — a difference of $93/month.

Which city has higher income, Aurora or Naperville?

Median household income is $84,320 in Aurora and $150,937 in Naperville. Median household income is $66,617/year higher in Naperville.

How do taxes compare between Colorado and Illinois?

Colorado has 4.4% income tax, 2.9% sales tax, and 0.51% property tax. Illinois has 4.95% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 2.07% property tax.

Should I move to Aurora or Naperville?

It depends on your priorities. Aurora has a cost index of 130 with median rent of $1,759/mo, while Naperville has a cost index of 147 with rent of $1,852/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Aurora, CO vs Naperville, IL (2026)

Aurora

Naperville

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons