Aurora, CO vs Springfield, MA: 130 vs 79

$1,759/mo ↑ 58%

Median Rent

$1,114/mo ↓ 37%

$84,320/yr ↑ 64%

Median Income

$51,339/yr ↓ 39%

$444,500 ↑ 100%

Home Value

$222,700 ↓ 50%

$1,762/mo ↑ 38%

Owner Costs

$1,276/mo ↓ 28%

390,201

Population

154,751

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Aurora, CO and Springfield, MA, the overall cost of living indices are 130 and 79 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $645/month cheaper in Springfield, saving renters about $7,740/year.

Median household income is $32,981/year higher in Aurora. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Aurora is $444,500 compared to $222,700 in Springfield.

Colorado has a lower income tax rate, making Aurora slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Aurora vs Springfield — common questions

Is Aurora or Springfield cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Springfield is cheaper to live in with an index of 79 compared to 130 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Aurora and Springfield?

Median rent in Aurora is $1,759/month and in Springfield it's $1,114/month — a difference of $645/month.

Which city has higher income, Aurora or Springfield?

Median household income is $84,320 in Aurora and $51,339 in Springfield. Median household income is $32,981/year higher in Aurora.

How do taxes compare between Colorado and Massachusetts?

Colorado has 4.4% income tax, 2.9% sales tax, and 0.51% property tax. Massachusetts has 9.0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.15% property tax.

Should I move to Aurora or Springfield?

It depends on your priorities. Aurora has a cost index of 130 with median rent of $1,759/mo, while Springfield has a cost index of 79 with rent of $1,114/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Aurora, CO vs Springfield, MA (2026)

Aurora

Springfield

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons