Aurora, CO vs Sugar Land, TX: 130 vs 135

$1,759/mo ↓ 9%

Median Rent

$1,939/mo ↑ 10%

$84,320/yr ↓ 39%

Median Income

$137,511/yr ↑ 63%

$444,500 ↑ 9%

Home Value

$406,600 ↓ 9%

$1,762/mo ↓ 11%

Owner Costs

$1,969/mo ↑ 12%

390,201

Population

109,735

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Aurora, CO and Sugar Land, TX, the overall cost of living indices are 130 and 135 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $180/month cheaper in Aurora, saving renters about $2,160/year.

Median household income is $53,191/year higher in Sugar Land. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Aurora is $444,500 compared to $406,600 in Sugar Land.

Texas has no state income tax, giving Sugar Land residents a significant tax advantage over Colorado's 4.4% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Aurora vs Sugar Land — common questions

Is Aurora or Sugar Land cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Aurora is cheaper to live in with an index of 130 compared to 135 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Aurora and Sugar Land?

Median rent in Aurora is $1,759/month and in Sugar Land it's $1,939/month — a difference of $180/month.

Which city has higher income, Aurora or Sugar Land?

Median household income is $84,320 in Aurora and $137,511 in Sugar Land. Median household income is $53,191/year higher in Sugar Land.

How do taxes compare between Colorado and Texas?

Colorado has 4.4% income tax, 2.9% sales tax, and 0.51% property tax. Texas has 0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.6% property tax.

Should I move to Aurora or Sugar Land?

It depends on your priorities. Aurora has a cost index of 130 with median rent of $1,759/mo, while Sugar Land has a cost index of 135 with rent of $1,939/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Aurora, CO vs Sugar Land, TX (2026)

Aurora

Sugar Land

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons