Aurora, IL vs Fairfield, CA: 100 vs 167

$1,535/mo ↓ 30%

Median Rent

$2,191/mo ↑ 43%

$90,109/yr ↓ 12%

Median Income

$102,321/yr ↑ 14%

$260,400 ↓ 56%

Home Value

$592,500 ↑ 128%

$1,591/mo ↓ 29%

Owner Costs

$2,226/mo ↑ 40%

179,867

Population

119,985

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Aurora, IL and Fairfield, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 100 and 167 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $656/month cheaper in Aurora, saving renters about $7,872/year.

Median household income is $12,212/year higher in Fairfield. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Aurora is $260,400 compared to $592,500 in Fairfield.

Illinois has a lower income tax rate, making Aurora slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Aurora vs Fairfield — common questions

Is Aurora or Fairfield cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Aurora is cheaper to live in with an index of 100 compared to 167 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Aurora and Fairfield?

Median rent in Aurora is $1,535/month and in Fairfield it's $2,191/month — a difference of $656/month.

Which city has higher income, Aurora or Fairfield?

Median household income is $90,109 in Aurora and $102,321 in Fairfield. Median household income is $12,212/year higher in Fairfield.

How do taxes compare between Illinois and California?

Illinois has 4.95% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 2.07% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Aurora or Fairfield?

It depends on your priorities. Aurora has a cost index of 100 with median rent of $1,535/mo, while Fairfield has a cost index of 167 with rent of $2,191/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Aurora, IL vs Fairfield, CA (2026)

Aurora

Fairfield

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons