Aurora, IL vs Richmond, CA: 100 vs 161

$1,535/mo ↓ 19%

Median Rent

$1,895/mo ↑ 23%

$90,109/yr ≈ Same

Median Income

$90,038/yr ≈ Same

$260,400 ↓ 60%

Home Value

$650,100 ↑ 150%

$1,591/mo ↓ 21%

Owner Costs

$2,015/mo ↑ 27%

179,867

Population

115,396

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Aurora, IL and Richmond, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 100 and 161 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $360/month cheaper in Aurora, saving renters about $4,320/year.

Median household income is $71/year higher in Aurora. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Aurora is $260,400 compared to $650,100 in Richmond.

Illinois has a lower income tax rate, making Aurora slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Aurora vs Richmond — common questions

Is Aurora or Richmond cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Aurora is cheaper to live in with an index of 100 compared to 161 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Aurora and Richmond?

Median rent in Aurora is $1,535/month and in Richmond it's $1,895/month — a difference of $360/month.

Which city has higher income, Aurora or Richmond?

Median household income is $90,109 in Aurora and $90,038 in Richmond. Median household income is $71/year higher in Aurora.

How do taxes compare between Illinois and California?

Illinois has 4.95% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 2.07% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Aurora or Richmond?

It depends on your priorities. Aurora has a cost index of 100 with median rent of $1,535/mo, while Richmond has a cost index of 161 with rent of $1,895/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Aurora, IL vs Richmond, CA (2026)

Aurora

Richmond

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons