Cost of Living: Bakersfield, CA vs Sterling Heights, MI (2026)

Bakersfield

California
104
VS

Sterling Heights

Michigan
87

Bakersfield is 20% more expensive than Sterling Heights.

$1,371/mo ↑ 8%
Median Rent
$1,267/mo ↓ 8%
$77,397/yr ↓ 1%
Median Income
$78,429/yr ↑ 1%
$347,300 ↑ 33%
Home Value
$260,700 ↓ 25%
$1,540/mo ↑ 24%
Owner Costs
$1,243/mo ↓ 19%
408,366
Population
133,473

Tax Comparison

13.3%
Income Tax
4.25%
7.25%
State Sales Tax
6.0%
0.71%
Property Tax
1.38%

Affordability

21.3%
rent-to-income
Affordability
19.4%
rent-to-income

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Bakersfield, CA and Sterling Heights, MI, the overall cost of living indices are 104 and 87 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $104/month cheaper in Sterling Heights, saving renters about $1,248/year.

Median household income is $1,032/year higher in Sterling Heights. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Bakersfield is $347,300 compared to $260,700 in Sterling Heights.

Michigan has a lower income tax rate, making Sterling Heights slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bakersfield vs Sterling Heights — common questions

Is Bakersfield or Sterling Heights cheaper to live in?
Based on our cost index, Sterling Heights is cheaper to live in with an index of 87 compared to 104 (US average = 100).
What is the rent difference between Bakersfield and Sterling Heights?
Median rent in Bakersfield is $1,371/month and in Sterling Heights it's $1,267/month — a difference of $104/month.
Which city has higher income, Bakersfield or Sterling Heights?
Median household income is $77,397 in Bakersfield and $78,429 in Sterling Heights. Median household income is $1,032/year higher in Sterling Heights.
How do taxes compare between California and Michigan?
California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax. Michigan has 4.25% income tax, 6.0% sales tax, and 1.38% property tax.
Should I move to Bakersfield or Sterling Heights?
It depends on your priorities. Bakersfield has a cost index of 104 with median rent of $1,371/mo, while Sterling Heights has a cost index of 87 with rent of $1,267/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.
View Bakersfield details → View Sterling Heights details →

More Comparisons

Other cost of living comparisons for Bakersfield and Sterling Heights

Bakersfield vs. Tulsa Bakersfield vs. Wichita Bakersfield vs. Minneapolis Bakersfield vs. Arlington Bakersfield vs. Oakland Bakersfield vs. Tampa Sterling Heights vs. Coral Springs Sterling Heights vs. New Haven Sterling Heights vs. Midland Sterling Heights vs. Carrollton Sterling Heights vs. Kent Sterling Heights vs. Santa Clara