Columbia, MO vs Sugar Land, TX: 80 vs 135

$1,067/mo ↓ 45%

Median Rent

$1,939/mo ↑ 82%

$64,488/yr ↓ 53%

Median Income

$137,511/yr ↑ 113%

$268,300 ↓ 34%

Home Value

$406,600 ↑ 52%

$1,114/mo ↓ 43%

Owner Costs

$1,969/mo ↑ 77%

127,200

Population

109,735

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Columbia, MO and Sugar Land, TX, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 135 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $872/month cheaper in Columbia, saving renters about $10,464/year.

Median household income is $73,023/year higher in Sugar Land. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Columbia is $268,300 compared to $406,600 in Sugar Land.

Texas has no state income tax, giving Sugar Land residents a significant tax advantage over Missouri's 4.95% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Columbia vs Sugar Land — common questions

Is Columbia or Sugar Land cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Columbia is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 135 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Columbia and Sugar Land?

Median rent in Columbia is $1,067/month and in Sugar Land it's $1,939/month — a difference of $872/month.

Which city has higher income, Columbia or Sugar Land?

Median household income is $64,488 in Columbia and $137,511 in Sugar Land. Median household income is $73,023/year higher in Sugar Land.

How do taxes compare between Missouri and Texas?

Missouri has 4.95% income tax, 4.225% sales tax, and 0.93% property tax. Texas has 0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.6% property tax.

Should I move to Columbia or Sugar Land?

It depends on your priorities. Columbia has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,067/mo, while Sugar Land has a cost index of 135 with rent of $1,939/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Columbia, MO vs Sugar Land, TX (2026)

Columbia

Sugar Land

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons