Cost of Living: Fort Lauderdale, FL vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA (2026)

Fort Lauderdale

Florida
132
VS

Rancho Cucamonga

California
182

Fort Lauderdale is 27% cheaper than Rancho Cucamonga.

$1,776/mo ↓ 22%
Median Rent
$2,286/mo ↑ 29%
$79,935/yr ↓ 27%
Median Income
$109,511/yr ↑ 37%
$455,600 ↓ 34%
Home Value
$694,400 ↑ 52%
$1,778/mo ↓ 23%
Owner Costs
$2,324/mo ↑ 31%
183,032
Population
174,693

Tax Comparison

0%
Income Tax
13.3%
6.0%
State Sales Tax
7.25%
0.86%
Property Tax
0.71%

Affordability

26.7%
rent-to-income
Affordability
25.0%
rent-to-income

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Fort Lauderdale, FL and Rancho Cucamonga, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 132 and 182 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $510/month cheaper in Fort Lauderdale, saving renters about $6,120/year.

Median household income is $29,576/year higher in Rancho Cucamonga. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Fort Lauderdale is $455,600 compared to $694,400 in Rancho Cucamonga.

Florida has no state income tax, giving Fort Lauderdale residents a significant tax advantage over California's 13.3% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Fort Lauderdale vs Rancho Cucamonga — common questions

Is Fort Lauderdale or Rancho Cucamonga cheaper to live in?
Based on our cost index, Fort Lauderdale is cheaper to live in with an index of 132 compared to 182 (US average = 100).
What is the rent difference between Fort Lauderdale and Rancho Cucamonga?
Median rent in Fort Lauderdale is $1,776/month and in Rancho Cucamonga it's $2,286/month — a difference of $510/month.
Which city has higher income, Fort Lauderdale or Rancho Cucamonga?
Median household income is $79,935 in Fort Lauderdale and $109,511 in Rancho Cucamonga. Median household income is $29,576/year higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
How do taxes compare between Florida and California?
Florida has 0% income tax, 6.0% sales tax, and 0.86% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.
Should I move to Fort Lauderdale or Rancho Cucamonga?
It depends on your priorities. Fort Lauderdale has a cost index of 132 with median rent of $1,776/mo, while Rancho Cucamonga has a cost index of 182 with rent of $2,286/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.
View Fort Lauderdale details → View Rancho Cucamonga details →

More Comparisons

Other cost of living comparisons for Fort Lauderdale and Rancho Cucamonga

Fort Lauderdale vs. Shreveport Fort Lauderdale vs. Chattanooga Fort Lauderdale vs. Newport News Fort Lauderdale vs. Aurora Fort Lauderdale vs. Mobile Fort Lauderdale vs. Ontario Rancho Cucamonga vs. Salem Rancho Cucamonga vs. Oceanside Rancho Cucamonga vs. Cary Rancho Cucamonga vs. Clarksville Rancho Cucamonga vs. Santa Rosa Rancho Cucamonga vs. Garden Grove