Frisco, TX vs Elk Grove, CA: 162 vs 168

$1,902/mo ↓ 13%

Median Rent

$2,180/mo ↑ 15%

$146,158/yr ↑ 20%

Median Income

$122,229/yr ↓ 16%

$595,400 ↓ 1%

Home Value

$603,400 ↑ 1%

$2,389/mo ↑ 7%

Owner Costs

$2,227/mo ↓ 7%

210,238

Population

177,221

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Frisco, TX and Elk Grove, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 162 and 168 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $278/month cheaper in Frisco, saving renters about $3,336/year.

Median household income is $23,929/year higher in Frisco. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Frisco is $595,400 compared to $603,400 in Elk Grove.

Texas has no state income tax, giving Frisco residents a significant tax advantage over California's 13.3% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frisco vs Elk Grove — common questions

Is Frisco or Elk Grove cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Frisco is cheaper to live in with an index of 162 compared to 168 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Frisco and Elk Grove?

Median rent in Frisco is $1,902/month and in Elk Grove it's $2,180/month — a difference of $278/month.

Which city has higher income, Frisco or Elk Grove?

Median household income is $146,158 in Frisco and $122,229 in Elk Grove. Median household income is $23,929/year higher in Frisco.

How do taxes compare between Texas and California?

Texas has 0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.6% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Frisco or Elk Grove?

It depends on your priorities. Frisco has a cost index of 162 with median rent of $1,902/mo, while Elk Grove has a cost index of 168 with rent of $2,180/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Frisco, TX vs Elk Grove, CA (2026)

Frisco

Elk Grove

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons