Kent, WA vs Sugar Land, TX: 145 vs 135

$1,833/mo ↓ 5%

Median Rent

$1,939/mo ↑ 6%

$90,416/yr ↓ 34%

Median Income

$137,511/yr ↑ 52%

$537,500 ↑ 32%

Home Value

$406,600 ↓ 24%

$1,915/mo ↓ 3%

Owner Costs

$1,969/mo ↑ 3%

135,015

Population

109,735

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Kent, WA and Sugar Land, TX, the overall cost of living indices are 145 and 135 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $106/month cheaper in Kent, saving renters about $1,272/year.

Median household income is $47,095/year higher in Sugar Land. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Kent is $537,500 compared to $406,600 in Sugar Land.

Frequently Asked Questions

Kent vs Sugar Land — common questions

Is Kent or Sugar Land cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Sugar Land is cheaper to live in with an index of 135 compared to 145 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Kent and Sugar Land?

Median rent in Kent is $1,833/month and in Sugar Land it's $1,939/month — a difference of $106/month.

Which city has higher income, Kent or Sugar Land?

Median household income is $90,416 in Kent and $137,511 in Sugar Land. Median household income is $47,095/year higher in Sugar Land.

How do taxes compare between Washington and Texas?

Washington has 0% income tax, 6.5% sales tax, and 0.92% property tax. Texas has 0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.6% property tax.

Should I move to Kent or Sugar Land?

It depends on your priorities. Kent has a cost index of 145 with median rent of $1,833/mo, while Sugar Land has a cost index of 135 with rent of $1,939/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Kent, WA vs Sugar Land, TX (2026)

Kent

Sugar Land

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons