Las Vegas, NV vs Fairfield, CA: 111 vs 167

$1,456/mo ↓ 34%

Median Rent

$2,191/mo ↑ 50%

$70,723/yr ↓ 31%

Median Income

$102,321/yr ↑ 45%

$395,300 ↓ 33%

Home Value

$592,500 ↑ 50%

$1,452/mo ↓ 35%

Owner Costs

$2,226/mo ↑ 53%

650,873

Population

119,985

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Las Vegas, NV and Fairfield, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 111 and 167 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $735/month cheaper in Las Vegas, saving renters about $8,820/year.

Median household income is $31,598/year higher in Fairfield. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Las Vegas is $395,300 compared to $592,500 in Fairfield.

Nevada has no state income tax, giving Las Vegas residents a significant tax advantage over California's 13.3% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Las Vegas vs Fairfield — common questions

Is Las Vegas or Fairfield cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Las Vegas is cheaper to live in with an index of 111 compared to 167 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Las Vegas and Fairfield?

Median rent in Las Vegas is $1,456/month and in Fairfield it's $2,191/month — a difference of $735/month.

Which city has higher income, Las Vegas or Fairfield?

Median household income is $70,723 in Las Vegas and $102,321 in Fairfield. Median household income is $31,598/year higher in Fairfield.

How do taxes compare between Nevada and California?

Nevada has 0% income tax, 6.85% sales tax, and 0.53% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Las Vegas or Fairfield?

It depends on your priorities. Las Vegas has a cost index of 111 with median rent of $1,456/mo, while Fairfield has a cost index of 167 with rent of $2,191/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Las Vegas, NV vs Fairfield, CA (2026)

Las Vegas

Fairfield

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons