Omaha, NE vs Antioch, CA: 80 vs 171

$1,150/mo ↓ 49%

Median Rent

$2,241/mo ↑ 95%

$72,708/yr ↓ 23%

Median Income

$94,256/yr ↑ 30%

$230,100 ↓ 62%

Home Value

$607,400 ↑ 164%

$1,249/mo ↓ 45%

Owner Costs

$2,271/mo ↑ 82%

488,197

Population

115,759

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Antioch, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 171 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $1,091/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $13,092/year.

Median household income is $21,548/year higher in Antioch. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $607,400 in Antioch.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Antioch — common questions

Is Omaha or Antioch cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 171 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Antioch?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Antioch it's $2,241/month — a difference of $1,091/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Antioch?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $94,256 in Antioch. Median household income is $21,548/year higher in Antioch.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Antioch?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Antioch has a cost index of 171 with rent of $2,241/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Antioch, CA (2026)

Omaha

Antioch

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons