Omaha, NE vs Concord, CA: 80 vs 187

$1,150/mo ↓ 48%

Median Rent

$2,226/mo ↑ 94%

$72,708/yr ↓ 33%

Median Income

$109,195/yr ↑ 50%

$230,100 ↓ 70%

Home Value

$755,900 ↑ 229%

$1,249/mo ↓ 45%

Owner Costs

$2,284/mo ↑ 83%

488,197

Population

124,260

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Concord, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 187 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $1,076/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $12,912/year.

Median household income is $36,487/year higher in Concord. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $755,900 in Concord.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Concord — common questions

Is Omaha or Concord cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 187 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Concord?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Concord it's $2,226/month — a difference of $1,076/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Concord?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $109,195 in Concord. Median household income is $36,487/year higher in Concord.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Concord?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Concord has a cost index of 187 with rent of $2,226/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Concord, CA (2026)

Omaha

Concord

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons