Omaha, NE vs Costa Mesa, CA: 80 vs 228

$1,150/mo ↓ 52%

Median Rent

$2,395/mo ↑ 108%

$72,708/yr ↓ 34%

Median Income

$110,073/yr ↑ 51%

$230,100 ↓ 78%

Home Value

$1,054,700 ↑ 358%

$1,249/mo ↓ 49%

Owner Costs

$2,462/mo ↑ 97%

488,197

Population

110,538

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Costa Mesa, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 228 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $1,245/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $14,940/year.

Median household income is $37,365/year higher in Costa Mesa. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $1,054,700 in Costa Mesa.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Costa Mesa — common questions

Is Omaha or Costa Mesa cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 228 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Costa Mesa?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Costa Mesa it's $2,395/month — a difference of $1,245/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Costa Mesa?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $110,073 in Costa Mesa. Median household income is $37,365/year higher in Costa Mesa.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Costa Mesa?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Costa Mesa has a cost index of 228 with rent of $2,395/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Costa Mesa, CA (2026)

Omaha

Costa Mesa

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons