Omaha, NE vs Elk Grove, CA: 80 vs 168

$1,150/mo ↓ 47%

Median Rent

$2,180/mo ↑ 90%

$72,708/yr ↓ 41%

Median Income

$122,229/yr ↑ 68%

$230,100 ↓ 62%

Home Value

$603,400 ↑ 162%

$1,249/mo ↓ 44%

Owner Costs

$2,227/mo ↑ 78%

488,197

Population

177,221

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Elk Grove, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 168 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $1,030/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $12,360/year.

Median household income is $49,521/year higher in Elk Grove. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $603,400 in Elk Grove.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Elk Grove — common questions

Is Omaha or Elk Grove cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 168 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Elk Grove?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Elk Grove it's $2,180/month — a difference of $1,030/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Elk Grove?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $122,229 in Elk Grove. Median household income is $49,521/year higher in Elk Grove.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Elk Grove?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Elk Grove has a cost index of 168 with rent of $2,180/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Elk Grove, CA (2026)

Omaha

Elk Grove

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons