Omaha, NE vs Fairfield, CA: 80 vs 167

$1,150/mo ↓ 48%

Median Rent

$2,191/mo ↑ 91%

$72,708/yr ↓ 29%

Median Income

$102,321/yr ↑ 41%

$230,100 ↓ 61%

Home Value

$592,500 ↑ 157%

$1,249/mo ↓ 44%

Owner Costs

$2,226/mo ↑ 78%

488,197

Population

119,985

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Fairfield, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 167 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $1,041/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $12,492/year.

Median household income is $29,613/year higher in Fairfield. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $592,500 in Fairfield.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Fairfield — common questions

Is Omaha or Fairfield cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 167 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Fairfield?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Fairfield it's $2,191/month — a difference of $1,041/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Fairfield?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $102,321 in Fairfield. Median household income is $29,613/year higher in Fairfield.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Fairfield?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Fairfield has a cost index of 167 with rent of $2,191/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Fairfield, CA (2026)

Omaha

Fairfield

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons