Omaha, NE vs Fontana, CA: 80 vs 146

$1,150/mo ↓ 34%

Median Rent

$1,733/mo ↑ 51%

$72,708/yr ↓ 26%

Median Income

$98,187/yr ↑ 35%

$230,100 ↓ 59%

Home Value

$558,500 ↑ 143%

$1,249/mo ↓ 37%

Owner Costs

$1,990/mo ↑ 59%

488,197

Population

211,921

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Fontana, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 146 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $583/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $6,996/year.

Median household income is $25,479/year higher in Fontana. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $558,500 in Fontana.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Fontana — common questions

Is Omaha or Fontana cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 146 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Fontana?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Fontana it's $1,733/month — a difference of $583/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Fontana?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $98,187 in Fontana. Median household income is $25,479/year higher in Fontana.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Fontana?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Fontana has a cost index of 146 with rent of $1,733/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Fontana, CA (2026)

Omaha

Fontana

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons