Omaha, NE vs Frisco, TX: 80 vs 162

$1,150/mo ↓ 40%

Median Rent

$1,902/mo ↑ 65%

$72,708/yr ↓ 50%

Median Income

$146,158/yr ↑ 101%

$230,100 ↓ 61%

Home Value

$595,400 ↑ 159%

$1,249/mo ↓ 48%

Owner Costs

$2,389/mo ↑ 91%

488,197

Population

210,238

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Frisco, TX, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 162 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $752/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $9,024/year.

Median household income is $73,450/year higher in Frisco. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $595,400 in Frisco.

Texas has no state income tax, giving Frisco residents a significant tax advantage over Nebraska's 6.64% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Frisco — common questions

Is Omaha or Frisco cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 162 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Frisco?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Frisco it's $1,902/month — a difference of $752/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Frisco?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $146,158 in Frisco. Median household income is $73,450/year higher in Frisco.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and Texas?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. Texas has 0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.6% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Frisco?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Frisco has a cost index of 162 with rent of $1,902/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Frisco, TX (2026)

Omaha

Frisco

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons