Omaha, NE vs Lancaster, CA: 80 vs 124

$1,150/mo ↓ 32%

Median Rent

$1,696/mo ↑ 47%

$72,708/yr ↓ 4%

Median Income

$76,083/yr ↑ 5%

$230,100 ↓ 44%

Home Value

$409,100 ↑ 78%

$1,249/mo ↓ 28%

Owner Costs

$1,746/mo ↑ 40%

488,197

Population

170,013

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Lancaster, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 124 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $546/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $6,552/year.

Median household income is $3,375/year higher in Lancaster. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $409,100 in Lancaster.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Lancaster — common questions

Is Omaha or Lancaster cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 124 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Lancaster?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Lancaster it's $1,696/month — a difference of $546/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Lancaster?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $76,083 in Lancaster. Median household income is $3,375/year higher in Lancaster.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Lancaster?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Lancaster has a cost index of 124 with rent of $1,696/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Lancaster, CA (2026)

Omaha

Lancaster

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons