Omaha, NE vs Oakland, CA: 80 vs 195

$1,150/mo ↓ 40%

Median Rent

$1,917/mo ↑ 67%

$72,708/yr ↓ 25%

Median Income

$97,369/yr ↑ 34%

$230,100 ↓ 75%

Home Value

$924,700 ↑ 302%

$1,249/mo ↓ 42%

Owner Costs

$2,164/mo ↑ 73%

488,197

Population

438,072

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Oakland, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 195 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $767/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $9,204/year.

Median household income is $24,661/year higher in Oakland. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $924,700 in Oakland.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Oakland — common questions

Is Omaha or Oakland cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 195 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Oakland?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Oakland it's $1,917/month — a difference of $767/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Oakland?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $97,369 in Oakland. Median household income is $24,661/year higher in Oakland.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Oakland?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Oakland has a cost index of 195 with rent of $1,917/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Oakland, CA (2026)

Omaha

Oakland

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons