Omaha, NE vs Pasadena, CA: 80 vs 220

$1,150/mo ↓ 48%

Median Rent

$2,218/mo ↑ 93%

$72,708/yr ↓ 30%

Median Income

$103,778/yr ↑ 43%

$230,100 ↓ 78%

Home Value

$1,045,000 ↑ 354%

$1,249/mo ↓ 47%

Owner Costs

$2,340/mo ↑ 87%

488,197

Population

136,462

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Pasadena, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 220 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $1,068/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $12,816/year.

Median household income is $31,070/year higher in Pasadena. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $1,045,000 in Pasadena.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Pasadena — common questions

Is Omaha or Pasadena cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 220 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Pasadena?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Pasadena it's $2,218/month — a difference of $1,068/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Pasadena?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $103,778 in Pasadena. Median household income is $31,070/year higher in Pasadena.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and California?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Pasadena?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Pasadena has a cost index of 220 with rent of $2,218/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Pasadena, CA (2026)

Omaha

Pasadena

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons