Omaha, NE vs Springfield, MA: 80 vs 79

$1,150/mo ↑ 3%

Median Rent

$1,114/mo ↓ 3%

$72,708/yr ↑ 42%

Median Income

$51,339/yr ↓ 29%

$230,100 ↑ 3%

Home Value

$222,700 ↓ 3%

$1,249/mo ↓ 2%

Owner Costs

$1,276/mo ↑ 2%

488,197

Population

154,751

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Springfield, MA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 79 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is comparable in both cities, with less than $50/month separating them.

Median household income is $21,369/year higher in Omaha. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $222,700 in Springfield.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Springfield — common questions

Is Omaha or Springfield cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Springfield is cheaper to live in with an index of 79 compared to 80 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Springfield?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Springfield it's $1,114/month — a difference of $36/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Springfield?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $51,339 in Springfield. Median household income is $21,369/year higher in Omaha.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and Massachusetts?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. Massachusetts has 9.0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.15% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Springfield?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Springfield has a cost index of 79 with rent of $1,114/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Springfield, MA (2026)

Omaha

Springfield

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons