Omaha, NE vs Sugar Land, TX: 80 vs 135

$1,150/mo ↓ 41%

Median Rent

$1,939/mo ↑ 69%

$72,708/yr ↓ 47%

Median Income

$137,511/yr ↑ 89%

$230,100 ↓ 43%

Home Value

$406,600 ↑ 77%

$1,249/mo ↓ 37%

Owner Costs

$1,969/mo ↑ 58%

488,197

Population

109,735

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Sugar Land, TX, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 135 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $789/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $9,468/year.

Median household income is $64,803/year higher in Sugar Land. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $406,600 in Sugar Land.

Texas has no state income tax, giving Sugar Land residents a significant tax advantage over Nebraska's 6.64% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Sugar Land — common questions

Is Omaha or Sugar Land cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 135 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Sugar Land?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Sugar Land it's $1,939/month — a difference of $789/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Sugar Land?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $137,511 in Sugar Land. Median household income is $64,803/year higher in Sugar Land.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and Texas?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. Texas has 0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.6% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Sugar Land?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Sugar Land has a cost index of 135 with rent of $1,939/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Sugar Land, TX (2026)

Omaha

Sugar Land

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons