Omaha, NE vs Worcester, MA: 80 vs 104

$1,150/mo ↓ 19%

Median Rent

$1,415/mo ↑ 23%

$72,708/yr ↑ 8%

Median Income

$67,544/yr ↓ 7%

$230,100 ↓ 32%

Home Value

$339,500 ↑ 48%

$1,249/mo ↓ 18%

Owner Costs

$1,521/mo ↑ 22%

488,197

Population

205,501

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Omaha, NE and Worcester, MA, the overall cost of living indices are 80 and 104 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $265/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $3,180/year.

Median household income is $5,164/year higher in Omaha. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Omaha is $230,100 compared to $339,500 in Worcester.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Omaha vs Worcester — common questions

Is Omaha or Worcester cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 104 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Omaha and Worcester?

Median rent in Omaha is $1,150/month and in Worcester it's $1,415/month — a difference of $265/month.

Which city has higher income, Omaha or Worcester?

Median household income is $72,708 in Omaha and $67,544 in Worcester. Median household income is $5,164/year higher in Omaha.

How do taxes compare between Nebraska and Massachusetts?

Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax. Massachusetts has 9.0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.15% property tax.

Should I move to Omaha or Worcester?

It depends on your priorities. Omaha has a cost index of 80 with median rent of $1,150/mo, while Worcester has a cost index of 104 with rent of $1,415/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Omaha, NE vs Worcester, MA (2026)

Omaha

Worcester

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons