Cost of Living: Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Rochester, MN (2026)

Rancho Cucamonga

California
182
VS

Rochester

Minnesota
93

Rancho Cucamonga is 96% more expensive than Rochester.

$2,286/mo ↑ 74%
Median Rent
$1,316/mo ↓ 42%
$109,511/yr ↑ 25%
Median Income
$87,767/yr ↓ 20%
$694,400 ↑ 142%
Home Value
$287,500 ↓ 59%
$2,324/mo ↑ 74%
Owner Costs
$1,332/mo ↓ 43%
174,693
Population
121,638

Tax Comparison

13.3%
Income Tax
9.85%
7.25%
State Sales Tax
6.875%
0.71%
Property Tax
1.11%

Affordability

25.0%
rent-to-income
Affordability
18.0%
rent-to-income

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Rancho Cucamonga, CA and Rochester, MN, the overall cost of living indices are 182 and 93 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $970/month cheaper in Rochester, saving renters about $11,640/year.

Median household income is $21,744/year higher in Rancho Cucamonga. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Rancho Cucamonga is $694,400 compared to $287,500 in Rochester.

Minnesota has a lower income tax rate, making Rochester slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Rancho Cucamonga vs Rochester — common questions

Is Rancho Cucamonga or Rochester cheaper to live in?
Based on our cost index, Rochester is cheaper to live in with an index of 93 compared to 182 (US average = 100).
What is the rent difference between Rancho Cucamonga and Rochester?
Median rent in Rancho Cucamonga is $2,286/month and in Rochester it's $1,316/month — a difference of $970/month.
Which city has higher income, Rancho Cucamonga or Rochester?
Median household income is $109,511 in Rancho Cucamonga and $87,767 in Rochester. Median household income is $21,744/year higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
How do taxes compare between California and Minnesota?
California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax. Minnesota has 9.85% income tax, 6.875% sales tax, and 1.11% property tax.
Should I move to Rancho Cucamonga or Rochester?
It depends on your priorities. Rancho Cucamonga has a cost index of 182 with median rent of $2,286/mo, while Rochester has a cost index of 93 with rent of $1,316/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.
View Rancho Cucamonga details → View Rochester details →

More Comparisons

Other cost of living comparisons for Rancho Cucamonga and Rochester

Rancho Cucamonga vs. Salem Rancho Cucamonga vs. Oceanside Rancho Cucamonga vs. Cary Rancho Cucamonga vs. Clarksville Rancho Cucamonga vs. Santa Rosa Rancho Cucamonga vs. Garden Grove Rochester vs. Independence Rochester vs. Lafayette Rochester vs. College Station Rochester vs. Ann Arbor Rochester vs. Clovis Rochester vs. Berkeley