Cost of Living: Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Sugar Land, TX (2026)

Rancho Cucamonga

California
182
VS

Sugar Land

Texas
135

Rancho Cucamonga is 35% more expensive than Sugar Land.

$2,286/mo ↑ 18%
Median Rent
$1,939/mo ↓ 15%
$109,511/yr ↓ 20%
Median Income
$137,511/yr ↑ 26%
$694,400 ↑ 71%
Home Value
$406,600 ↓ 41%
$2,324/mo ↑ 18%
Owner Costs
$1,969/mo ↓ 15%
174,693
Population
109,735

Tax Comparison

13.3%
Income Tax
0%
7.25%
State Sales Tax
6.25%
0.71%
Property Tax
1.6%

Affordability

25.0%
rent-to-income
Affordability
16.9%
rent-to-income

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Rancho Cucamonga, CA and Sugar Land, TX, the overall cost of living indices are 182 and 135 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $347/month cheaper in Sugar Land, saving renters about $4,164/year.

Median household income is $28,000/year higher in Sugar Land. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Rancho Cucamonga is $694,400 compared to $406,600 in Sugar Land.

Texas has no state income tax, giving Sugar Land residents a significant tax advantage over California's 13.3% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Rancho Cucamonga vs Sugar Land — common questions

Is Rancho Cucamonga or Sugar Land cheaper to live in?
Based on our cost index, Sugar Land is cheaper to live in with an index of 135 compared to 182 (US average = 100).
What is the rent difference between Rancho Cucamonga and Sugar Land?
Median rent in Rancho Cucamonga is $2,286/month and in Sugar Land it's $1,939/month — a difference of $347/month.
Which city has higher income, Rancho Cucamonga or Sugar Land?
Median household income is $109,511 in Rancho Cucamonga and $137,511 in Sugar Land. Median household income is $28,000/year higher in Sugar Land.
How do taxes compare between California and Texas?
California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax. Texas has 0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.6% property tax.
Should I move to Rancho Cucamonga or Sugar Land?
It depends on your priorities. Rancho Cucamonga has a cost index of 182 with median rent of $2,286/mo, while Sugar Land has a cost index of 135 with rent of $1,939/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.
View Rancho Cucamonga details → View Sugar Land details →

More Comparisons

Other cost of living comparisons for Rancho Cucamonga and Sugar Land

Rancho Cucamonga vs. Salem Rancho Cucamonga vs. Oceanside Rancho Cucamonga vs. Cary Rancho Cucamonga vs. Clarksville Rancho Cucamonga vs. Santa Rosa Rancho Cucamonga vs. Garden Grove Sugar Land vs. Santa Maria Sugar Land vs. Greeley Sugar Land vs. Ventura Sugar Land vs. South Fulton Sugar Land vs. Temecula Sugar Land vs. Sparks