Salem, OR vs Sugar Land, TX: 105 vs 135

$1,323/mo ↓ 32%

Median Rent

$1,939/mo ↑ 47%

$71,900/yr ↓ 48%

Median Income

$137,511/yr ↑ 91%

$382,400 ↓ 6%

Home Value

$406,600 ↑ 6%

$1,440/mo ↓ 27%

Owner Costs

$1,969/mo ↑ 37%

176,666

Population

109,735

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Salem, OR and Sugar Land, TX, the overall cost of living indices are 105 and 135 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $616/month cheaper in Salem, saving renters about $7,392/year.

Median household income is $65,611/year higher in Sugar Land. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Salem is $382,400 compared to $406,600 in Sugar Land.

Texas has no state income tax, giving Sugar Land residents a significant tax advantage over Oregon's 9.9% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Salem vs Sugar Land — common questions

Is Salem or Sugar Land cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Salem is cheaper to live in with an index of 105 compared to 135 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Salem and Sugar Land?

Median rent in Salem is $1,323/month and in Sugar Land it's $1,939/month — a difference of $616/month.

Which city has higher income, Salem or Sugar Land?

Median household income is $71,900 in Salem and $137,511 in Sugar Land. Median household income is $65,611/year higher in Sugar Land.

How do taxes compare between Oregon and Texas?

Oregon has 9.9% income tax, 0% sales tax, and 0.93% property tax. Texas has 0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.6% property tax.

Should I move to Salem or Sugar Land?

It depends on your priorities. Salem has a cost index of 105 with median rent of $1,323/mo, while Sugar Land has a cost index of 135 with rent of $1,939/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Salem, OR vs Sugar Land, TX (2026)

Salem

Sugar Land

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons