Cost of Living: Sioux Falls, SD vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA (2026)

Sioux Falls

South Dakota
78
VS

Rancho Cucamonga

California
182

Sioux Falls is 57% cheaper than Rancho Cucamonga.

$993/mo ↓ 57%
Median Rent
$2,286/mo ↑ 130%
$74,714/yr ↓ 32%
Median Income
$109,511/yr ↑ 47%
$271,400 ↓ 61%
Home Value
$694,400 ↑ 156%
$1,122/mo ↓ 52%
Owner Costs
$2,324/mo ↑ 107%
197,642
Population
174,693

Tax Comparison

0%
Income Tax
13.3%
4.2%
State Sales Tax
7.25%
1.28%
Property Tax
0.71%

Affordability

15.9%
rent-to-income
Affordability
25.0%
rent-to-income

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Sioux Falls, SD and Rancho Cucamonga, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 78 and 182 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $1,293/month cheaper in Sioux Falls, saving renters about $15,516/year.

Median household income is $34,797/year higher in Rancho Cucamonga. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Sioux Falls is $271,400 compared to $694,400 in Rancho Cucamonga.

South Dakota has no state income tax, giving Sioux Falls residents a significant tax advantage over California's 13.3% rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sioux Falls vs Rancho Cucamonga — common questions

Is Sioux Falls or Rancho Cucamonga cheaper to live in?
Based on our cost index, Sioux Falls is cheaper to live in with an index of 78 compared to 182 (US average = 100).
What is the rent difference between Sioux Falls and Rancho Cucamonga?
Median rent in Sioux Falls is $993/month and in Rancho Cucamonga it's $2,286/month — a difference of $1,293/month.
Which city has higher income, Sioux Falls or Rancho Cucamonga?
Median household income is $74,714 in Sioux Falls and $109,511 in Rancho Cucamonga. Median household income is $34,797/year higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
How do taxes compare between South Dakota and California?
South Dakota has 0% income tax, 4.2% sales tax, and 1.28% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.
Should I move to Sioux Falls or Rancho Cucamonga?
It depends on your priorities. Sioux Falls has a cost index of 78 with median rent of $993/mo, while Rancho Cucamonga has a cost index of 182 with rent of $2,286/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.
View Sioux Falls details → View Rancho Cucamonga details →

More Comparisons

Other cost of living comparisons for Sioux Falls and Rancho Cucamonga

Sioux Falls vs. Grand Rapids Sioux Falls vs. Overland Park Sioux Falls vs. Montgomery Sioux Falls vs. Huntington Beach Sioux Falls vs. Grand Prairie Sioux Falls vs. Peoria Rancho Cucamonga vs. Salem Rancho Cucamonga vs. Oceanside Rancho Cucamonga vs. Cary Rancho Cucamonga vs. Clarksville Rancho Cucamonga vs. Santa Rosa Rancho Cucamonga vs. Garden Grove