Tulsa is 28% cheaper than Rochester.
When comparing Tulsa, OK and Rochester, MN, the overall cost of living indices are 67 and 93 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $318/month cheaper in Tulsa, saving renters about $3,816/year.
Median household income is $29,360/year higher in Rochester. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Tulsa is $189,600 compared to $287,500 in Rochester.
Oklahoma has a lower income tax rate, making Tulsa slightly more tax-friendly.
Tulsa vs Rochester — common questions
Other cost of living comparisons for Tulsa and Rochester