Cost of Living: Worcester, MA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA (2026)

Worcester

Massachusetts
104
VS

Rancho Cucamonga

California
182

Worcester is 43% cheaper than Rancho Cucamonga.

$1,415/mo ↓ 38%
Median Rent
$2,286/mo ↑ 62%
$67,544/yr ↓ 38%
Median Income
$109,511/yr ↑ 62%
$339,500 ↓ 51%
Home Value
$694,400 ↑ 105%
$1,521/mo ↓ 35%
Owner Costs
$2,324/mo ↑ 53%
205,501
Population
174,693

Tax Comparison

9.0%
Income Tax
13.3%
6.25%
State Sales Tax
7.25%
1.15%
Property Tax
0.71%

Affordability

25.1%
rent-to-income
Affordability
25.0%
rent-to-income

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Worcester, MA and Rancho Cucamonga, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 104 and 182 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $871/month cheaper in Worcester, saving renters about $10,452/year.

Median household income is $41,967/year higher in Rancho Cucamonga. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Worcester is $339,500 compared to $694,400 in Rancho Cucamonga.

Massachusetts has a lower income tax rate, making Worcester slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Worcester vs Rancho Cucamonga — common questions

Is Worcester or Rancho Cucamonga cheaper to live in?
Based on our cost index, Worcester is cheaper to live in with an index of 104 compared to 182 (US average = 100).
What is the rent difference between Worcester and Rancho Cucamonga?
Median rent in Worcester is $1,415/month and in Rancho Cucamonga it's $2,286/month — a difference of $871/month.
Which city has higher income, Worcester or Rancho Cucamonga?
Median household income is $67,544 in Worcester and $109,511 in Rancho Cucamonga. Median household income is $41,967/year higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
How do taxes compare between Massachusetts and California?
Massachusetts has 9.0% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 1.15% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.
Should I move to Worcester or Rancho Cucamonga?
It depends on your priorities. Worcester has a cost index of 104 with median rent of $1,415/mo, while Rancho Cucamonga has a cost index of 182 with rent of $2,286/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.
View Worcester details → View Rancho Cucamonga details →

More Comparisons

Other cost of living comparisons for Worcester and Rancho Cucamonga

Worcester vs. Cape Coral Worcester vs. Columbus Worcester vs. Yonkers Worcester vs. Salt Lake City Worcester vs. Fayetteville Worcester vs. Little Rock Rancho Cucamonga vs. Salem Rancho Cucamonga vs. Oceanside Rancho Cucamonga vs. Cary Rancho Cucamonga vs. Clarksville Rancho Cucamonga vs. Santa Rosa Rancho Cucamonga vs. Garden Grove