Chicago, IL vs Antioch, CA: 100 vs 171

$1,380/mo ↓ 38%

Median Rent

$2,241/mo ↑ 62%

$75,134/yr ↓ 20%

Median Income

$94,256/yr ↑ 25%

$315,200 ↓ 48%

Home Value

$607,400 ↑ 93%

$1,502/mo ↓ 34%

Owner Costs

$2,271/mo ↑ 51%

2,707,648

Population

115,759

Detailed Comparison

When comparing Chicago, IL and Antioch, CA, the overall cost of living indices are 100 and 171 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $861/month cheaper in Chicago, saving renters about $10,332/year.

Median household income is $19,122/year higher in Antioch. Home values also differ significantly — the median in Chicago is $315,200 compared to $607,400 in Antioch.

Illinois has a lower income tax rate, making Chicago slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Chicago vs Antioch — common questions

Is Chicago or Antioch cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Chicago is cheaper to live in with an index of 100 compared to 171 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between Chicago and Antioch?

Median rent in Chicago is $1,380/month and in Antioch it's $2,241/month — a difference of $861/month.

Which city has higher income, Chicago or Antioch?

Median household income is $75,134 in Chicago and $94,256 in Antioch. Median household income is $19,122/year higher in Antioch.

How do taxes compare between Illinois and California?

Illinois has 4.95% income tax, 6.25% sales tax, and 2.07% property tax. California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax.

Should I move to Chicago or Antioch?

It depends on your priorities. Chicago has a cost index of 100 with median rent of $1,380/mo, while Antioch has a cost index of 171 with rent of $2,241/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: Chicago, IL vs Antioch, CA (2026)

Chicago

Antioch

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons