San Francisco, CA vs Omaha, NE: 267 vs 80

$2,419/mo ↑ 110%

Median Rent

$1,150/mo ↓ 52%

$141,446/yr ↑ 95%

Median Income

$72,708/yr ↓ 49%

$1,380,500 ↑ 500%

Home Value

$230,100 ↓ 83%

$2,620/mo ↑ 110%

Owner Costs

$1,249/mo ↓ 52%

836,321

Population

488,197

Detailed Comparison

When comparing San Francisco, CA and Omaha, NE, the overall cost of living indices are 267 and 80 respectively (national median = 100). Rent is $1,269/month cheaper in Omaha, saving renters about $15,228/year.

Median household income is $68,738/year higher in San Francisco. Home values also differ significantly — the median in San Francisco is $1,380,500 compared to $230,100 in Omaha.

Nebraska has a lower income tax rate, making Omaha slightly more tax-friendly.

Frequently Asked Questions

San Francisco vs Omaha — common questions

Is San Francisco or Omaha cheaper to live in?

Based on our cost index, Omaha is cheaper to live in with an index of 80 compared to 267 (US average = 100).

What is the rent difference between San Francisco and Omaha?

Median rent in San Francisco is $2,419/month and in Omaha it's $1,150/month — a difference of $1,269/month.

Which city has higher income, San Francisco or Omaha?

Median household income is $141,446 in San Francisco and $72,708 in Omaha. Median household income is $68,738/year higher in San Francisco.

How do taxes compare between California and Nebraska?

California has 13.3% income tax, 7.25% sales tax, and 0.71% property tax. Nebraska has 6.64% income tax, 5.5% sales tax, and 1.73% property tax.

Should I move to San Francisco or Omaha?

It depends on your priorities. San Francisco has a cost index of 267 with median rent of $2,419/mo, while Omaha has a cost index of 80 with rent of $1,150/mo. Consider income potential, tax burden, and lifestyle preferences alongside raw cost data.

Cost of Living: San Francisco, CA vs Omaha, NE (2026)

San Francisco

Omaha

Tax Comparison

Affordability

Detailed Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons